Why College? (2 Theories)

This article from the New Yorker is an extended book review that gives the author an opportunity to explore some ideas that involve wider implications for higher education.

I’ll mention one: his two-pronged idea of what college is for. He writes that most people think of college as one of the following:

1) a place to certify students for the job market, essentially sorting them out for potential employers. If you can jump through the hoop, then employers will assume you can jump through their hoops, too, and accept you as worthy.

2) a place of higher learning where members of society are enlightened, refined, introduced to higher forms of knowledge, and made to be more engaged citizens who will in turn improve society.

Theory 1 depends on tough standards, reliable testing, and on the college degree having economic value (all of which, according to the article, are on the decline).

Theory 2 depends on a free exchange of ideas, students motivated to grow and improve, and professors committed to teaching and engaging with students (all of which, according to the article, doesn’t exist).

The article is a bit of downer in places, but it’s also a call for action and suggests that major changes are needed.

So, why did you go to college?

About these ads
Leave a comment

1 Comment

  1. More on Bryan Caplan’s “The Magic of Education” « Andrew Neuendorf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers

%d bloggers like this: